Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Blog #25: Quasars and their Black Holes

4) One feature you surely noticed was the strong, broad emission lines. Here is a closer look at the strongest emission line in the spectrum: 



This feature arises from hydrogen gas in the accretion disk. The photons radiated during the accretion process are constantly ionizing nearby hydrogen atoms. So there are many free protons and electrons in the disk. When one of these protons comes close enough to an electron, they recombine into a new hydrogen atom, and the electron will lose energy until it reaches the lowest allowed energy state, labeled $n=1$ in the model of the hydrogen atom shown below (and called the ground state):



On its way to the ground state, the electron passes through other allowed energy states (called excited states). Technically speaking, atoms have an infinite number of allowed energy states, but electrons spend most of their time occupying those of lowest energies, and so only the $n = 3$ and $n=3$ excited states are shown above for simplicity. 

Because the difference in energy between e.g., the $n =2$ and $n= 1$ states are always the same, the electron always loses the same amount of energy when it passes between them. Thus, the photon it emits during this process will always have the same wavelength. For the hydrogen atom, the energy difference between the $n=2$ and $n=1$ energy levels 10.19 eV, corresponding to a photon wavelength of $\lambda = 1215.67$ Angstroms. This is the most commonly-observed atomic transition in all of astronomy, as hydrogen is by far the most abundant element in the Universe. It is referred to as the Lyman $\alpha$ transition (or Ly$\alpha$ for short). 

It turns out that that strongest emission feature you observed in the quasar spectrum aboves arises from Ly$\alpha$ emission from material orbiting around the central black hole. 

(a) Recall the Doppler equation: 
\begin{align*}
\frac{\lambda_{observed} - \lambda_{emitted}}{\lambda_{emitted}} = z \approx \frac{v}{c}
\end{align*}
Using the data provided, calculate the redshift of this quasar.

Looking at the zoomed-in graph of the spectrum above, the peak of the emission line is at 1410 Angstroms, which shows that the $\lambda_{observed} = 1410$ Angstrom. We know that the actual emitted emission for the Ly$\alpha$ transition is $\lambda_{emitted} = 1215.67$. Using the equation above, we can solve for the redshift as follows:

\begin{align*}
z &= \frac{\lambda_{observed} - \lambda_{emitted}}{\lambda_{emitted}}\\
z &= \frac{1410 - 1215.67}{1215.67}\\
z &\approx 0.16
\end{align*}

Therefore, the redshift of this quasar is 0.16.

(b) Again using the data provided, along with the Virial Theorem, estimate the mass of the black hole in this quasar. It would help to know that the typical accretion disk around a $10^8 M_{\odot}$ black hole extends to a radius of $r = 10^{15}$ m. 

The velocity at which this quasar is moving away from us can be found by looking at the width of the broadened peak. The broadened peak is about 15 Angstroms, so the redshift between these two peaks would be $z = \frac{15}{1215} \approx 0.012$.

However, we only use half that value for the actual velocity, since half of the quasar is coming towards us, and the other half is going away from us. Therefore, $z = 0.006$. Using the equation above we can calculate how fast the quasar is going away from us:

\begin{align*}
z &= \frac{v}{c}\\
v&= zc\\
v &= 0.006c
\end{align*}

Now that we have the speed at which the quasar is moving away from us, we can use the Virial Theorem to solve for the mass of the black hole, $M$ as follows:

\begin{align*}
K &= -\frac{1}{2}U\\
\frac{1}{2}mv^2 &= \frac{1}{2}\frac{GMm}{r}\\
v^2 &= \frac{GM}{r}\\
M &= \frac{v^2r}{G}\\
M &= \frac{(0.006 \times 3 \times 10^{10})^2(10^{17})}{6.7 \times 10^{-8}}\\
M &= 4.8 \times 10^{40} \text{ grams}\\
M &= 2.4 \times 10^7 M_{\odot}
\end{align*}

The mass of the black hole is $2.4 \times 10^7 M_{\odot}$.


Blog #24: Analyzing a Quasar's Spectrum

3) Such bright objects, known as quasars, can be easily observed at great distances, and astronomers started taking spectra of them back in the 1960's. Here's a spectrum of the first quasar ever discovered, called 3C 273: 



What are the main features you see in this spectrum (ignoring the gap in the data at around 1625 A)? 

The first noticeable thing in this plot is that as you get to larger wavelengths, the flux drops, as is evident by the negative slope of the data.

The second noticeable thing is that the graph has 3 peaks that signify spectral emissions. The three peaks are at around 1400 Angstroms, 1800 Angstroms, and 2200 Angstroms.

The last noticeable thing in this graph is that there are several small dips in the graph, showing the absorption lines in the spectrum.

Blog #23: Astronomy + X = The Martian


This past month, I went to see the critically acclaimed film, The Martian. I was absolutely. blown. away (just like Mark Watney). I think this is the best film, bar none, that I have ever seen. It meshes the fields of science fiction, and actual science, in a way that it brings the literal future of human space travel at the forefront of American cinema.

The plot of the movie was very straight forward. 6 astronauts were on the Ares IV manned mission to Mars. A dust storm hit the crew, which caused Mark Watney, a botanist, to be impaled by a satellite dish and flown away from his crew members. The crew received a signal from Watney's suit saying he died, and the crew boarded the Hermes spacecraft and left without him. However, it turns out that the Mark Watney was still alive. The rest of the story is about how Watney tries to survive on a barren planet by growing his own food, communicating with NASA through the decommissioned Pathfinder mission, and eventually preparing to leave Mars. Along the way, the harsh Martian environment hampers his plans and make it nearly impossible for Watney to survive.

The first images of the Martian
surface taken by Mariner 4 in 1965.
Images by the Mariner 9 taken in 1971
that shocked the world to see craters
 and valleys on the Martian surface
This movie, directed by Ridley Scott, was based on the novel written by Andy Weir. The movie cast worked with NASA to get the most accurate description of human space flight and the conditions on Mars that are known at by scientists at the present time. As a result, in the opening scenes of this movie, we see breathtaking panoramas of the surface of Mars, with its many mountains, it's red atmosphere, and it's planetary bone-dry desert. It is worth noting how in just the opening scene of this movie, the intersection of science and filmmaking has brought all the discoveries found on Mars in the last half-century to everyday moviegoers. Just think about it... the first pictures of the surface of Mars were taken by the Mariner 4 in 1965 that were nothing more than a grainy, grayscale image.
First color photo taken on the
surface of Mars by Spirit in 2003

6 years later, the Mariner 9 mission in 1971 shocked the scientific community when they discovered that Mars had craters and valleys. Fast forwarding to 2003, the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, took the first high definition colored photos from the surface of Mars that showed Mars' rugged surface in detail. Finally, right now, the Mars Science Laboratory, known as Curiosity, has sent back high def photos of Mars that show the same level of detail that was seen in the movie, The Martian. In fact, when looking at the pictures of Mars taken from Curiosity and those depicted in The Martian, the similarities are uncanny.




Images from Mars Science Laboratory, Curiosity

Images of the surface of Mars depicted in The Martian.
Just by comparing what we know now about Mars and having it depicted accurately on the big screen, the average person now knows more about the Martian surface than most scientists did even 20-30 years ago.

The other amazing feat that the Martian was able to pull off was that all the science explained in the movie was actual science, including the technologies being used in the movie. Every technology used in The Martian was the technology we currently have to take people to Mars, so no technology was fabricated.

So that begs the question, if the technology in the movie was real, and the surface of Mars was depicted as scientifically accurate, is it even fair to call this movie science fiction? Well that dust storm in the beginning of the movie was probably the most unrealistic aspect of the whole movie, since Mars doesn't have an atmosphere thick enough to sustain such forceful winds. However, it is very much possible for people to go to Mars, right now, if given enough funding to build everything necessary to send a manned mission. This film gave NASA and the scientific community the public relations boost it needed to re-ignite the interest in space travel to average population. Right now, NASA just started recruiting the next generation of astronauts, because a real manned mission to Mars is being planned for the 2030's. Hopefully in the real manned missions, NASA doesn't leave anyone behind, and if they do, at least that astronaut has a decent shot at survival if they simply watch The Martian.


Blog #22: Sound-Crossing Timescale - White Dwarf Goes Supernova

3) A white dwarf that exceeds the Chandrasekhar mass will start to fuse carbon in its interior, which releases a great deal of heat, which increases the internal pressure of the white dwarf. However, because the white dwarf is "trying" to support itself using degeneracy pressure, and increasing this pressure doesn't change the star's radius, the increasing temperature leads to more fusion, more energy, and a run-away fusion process is initiated.

Once the run-away fusion inside the white dwarf is "ignited", it propagates as a wave travelling outward at the speed of sound $c_s$. How much time does it take the flame to sweep outward across the radius of the white dwarf? This is also known as the "sound-crossing timescale."

How does this time scale relate to the density of the white dwarf?

In problem 2, the speed of sound, in terms of mass, and radius, is determined to be:

\begin{align*}
c_s = \left(\frac{GM}{5R}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\end{align*}

We also know that speed is defined as a distance over time, which can rearranged to solve for time. The equation for time, therefore, is:

\begin{align*}
t_{sc} = \frac{R}{c_{s}}
\end{align*}

where $c_s$ is the speed of sound, $t_{sc}$ is the "sound-crossing timescale", and $R$ is the radius of the white dwarf. We can substitute the speed of sound $c_s = \left(\frac{GM}{5R}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ and solve for the "sound-crossing timescale" as follows:

\begin{align*}
t_{sc} &= \frac{R}{c_{s}}\\
t_{sc} &= \frac{R}{ \left(\frac{GM}{5R}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\\
t_{sc} &= \left(\frac{5R^3}{GM}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\end{align*}

In order to see how the sound-crossing timescale relates to density, we can use dimensional analysis:

\begin{align*}
t_{sc} &= \left(\frac{5R^3}{GM}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}\\
t_{sc} &= \left[\frac{m^3}{g}\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}\\
t_{sc} &\propto \sqrt{\frac{1}{\rho}}
\end{align*}

This shows that the sound-crossing timescale is inversely proportional to the square root of the density.

Blog #21: White Dwarf Goes Type 1a Supernova

1) White dwarfs are supported internally against the force of gravity by "electron degeneracy" pressure (encountered in Astronomy 16). The maximum mass that can be supported by this exotic form of pressure is the 1.4 $M_{\odot}$ (also known as the Chandrasekhar Mass). The radius of our white dwarf is approximately twice the radius of the Earth, or ~ $12 \times 10^8$ cm.

Given the mass, M, and radius, R, derive an algebraic expression for the internal pressure of a white dwarf with these properties. Start with the Virial theorem, recall that the internal kinetic energy per particle is $\frac{3}{2}kT$, where $k = 1.4 \times 10^{-16}$ erg $K^{-1}$ is the Boltzmann constant. You can also assume the interior of the white dwarf is an ideal gas, and its mass is uniformly distributed.

The internal kinetic energy of a single particle is $\frac{3}{2}kT$, so the kinetic energy of the total system of $N$ particles is going to be:

\begin{align*}
K = \frac{3}{2}NkT
\end{align*}

Since the interior of a star can be considered an ideal gas, we can use the ideal gas relation, $PV = NkT$, where $V = \frac{4}{3}\pi R^3$ is the volume of the star. Using this equation, we can solve for $K$ in terms of pressure and volume as follows:

\begin{align*}
K &= \frac{3}{2}NkT\\
K &= \frac{3}{2}PV\\
K &= \frac{3}{2}P \left(\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3\right)\\
K &= 2\pi PR^3
\end{align*}

We also know that the total potential energy in the system from the previous worksheet is:

\begin{align*}
U = -\frac{3GM^2}{5R}
\end{align*}

Using the Virial Theorem, we can solve for the internal pressure as follows:

\begin{align*}
K &= -\frac{1}{2}U\\
2\pi PR^3 &= -\frac{1}{2}\left(-\frac{3GM^2}{5R}\right)\\
P &= \frac{\frac{3GM^2}{10R}}{2\pi R^3}\\
P &= \frac{3GM^2}{20\pi R^4}
\end{align*}

The internal pressure inside the white dwarf star is: $P = \frac{3GM^2}{20\pi R^4}$.

Blog #20: The Hubble Tuning Fork

In 1926, Edwin Hubble, for whom the Hubble Space Telescope is named after, saw that the different galaxies seen in the night sky had different shapes and structures. Therefore, he created a classification system for galaxies that split these galaxies into 3 categories, namely: (1) Elliptical galaxies, (2) Spiral galaxies, and (3) Irregular galaxies. Each of these three classifications had further sub-divisions, which ended up creating a system of galaxy classification known as the Hubble Tuning Fork. The Hubble Tuning Fork shows how the different categories of galaxies and their respective subdivisions are all related to each other in terms of shape and structure. In order to understand the Tuning Fork, let's first discuss the subdivisions of the Elliptical, Spiral, and Irregular galaxies.

Elliptical Galaxies: 



Elliptical galaxies get their name for their uniform, elliptical shape. The elliptical galaxies are classified by the eccentricity of the ellipse, where E0 is an elliptical galaxy with no eccentricity, and is therefore perfectly round, to E7, where the eccentricity is very high. The "E" in the E0 - E7 range stands for "elliptical", specifying only elliptical galaxies. Look at the diagram below to get a sense of the categories of Elliptical galaxies:









Spiral Galaxies:



Spiral galaxies get their name for their characteristic bands, or "arms" of gas and dust that swirl around the center of the galaxy. Spiral galaxies come in two subcategories: (1) without a central bar $S$ (top photo), (2) with a central bar $SB$ (bottom photo).

These two categories are further divided by the tightness of their spiral arms, where spiral galaxies with very tight spirals are in category "a",  galaxies with medium spirals in category "b", and galaxies with loose spirals are in category "c". See below for the differences between these galaxies:



There is also another category of spiral galaxies, where there are no spirals at all! This category, S0, is characterized by the fact that there is a bulge, and a distinct disk, unlike elliptical galaxies, but the disk doesn't have any arms. An example of a S0 galaxy is the Sombrero Galaxy:


Irregular Galaxies: 




Irregular galaxies are those that do not belong to either spiral or elliptical galaxies, and can take on a range of shapes, from shapeless blobs, to distorted spirals.


Hubble's Tuning Fork: 

All these different types of galaxies can be rearranged to show how their shapes relate to each other in the form of a tuning fork. Here's a tuning fork I made:


Blog #19: An Explosive Signature of Explosive Galaxies

We learned in Astro 16 the conditions that allow a star to form. Ideally, stars form in large clouds of gas and dust.

We learned in Astro 17 that galaxies can collide. For example, the Milky Way Galaxy and the Andromeda Galaxy are in a direct collision course with each other.

So what does star formation and galaxy mergers have in common? The answer lies in what is known as Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). Gamma-Ray Bursts are narrow beams of intense radiation that are the most powerful event in the Universe aside from the Big Bang itself. They occur when a truly massive star, with a mass of at least 15 $M_{\odot}$ dies and collapses in on itself. When a star of this size runs out of fuel and dies, it explodes in what is known as a "hypernova", which are considered to be substantially more energetic explosions than standard supernovae. In addition to the hypernova, the collapsing star also releases Gamma Ray Bursts.

Another important thing to note is that stars this massive have relatively short life-spans since they use up all of their fuel much faster than smaller stars. Therefore, galaxies that seem to have a lot of GRB's signal that the galaxy is forming new stars. In galaxies, there are two types of gasses: (1) hot, ionized gas, and (2) cold, neutral gas. Star formation, especially for the really massive stars, happens in regions of cold, neutral gas, which is hard to detect. This article shows how researchers observed this cold, neutral gas in galaxies within a 100 million light years away, which is about 50 times further than the Andromeda Galaxy. Because of their relative close distance to us, researchers were able to use the radio frequency on the 21 cm line to detect this cold neutral gas. This region of the galaxy had a lot of GRBs.

Looking at a density map of the cold, neutral gas, it seemed that the gas was disturbed, and was outside the main disk of the galaxy. This suggests that the galaxy had collided with another, smaller galaxy, which resulted in the scattered cold, neutral gas. The other important conclusion was that the collision could have "shock-compressed" the gas, which sparked the formation of massive stars. Since these massive stars give off GMRs when they die, the presence of GMRs could mean that a galaxy is the result of a galaxy collision and merger.

Unfortunately, this was observed only in galaxies that are within a 100 million miles from us. Since the cold, neutral gas is hard to detect because the 21 cm emission line is harder to see further out, it will be harder to conclude that the presence of GRBs are predictive of galaxy mergers. However, this research is on the path to show not only that GMRs are indicative of galaxies that are forming new stars, but the composition and history of the galaxy in which they reside.